Scroll down for information on:
Royalfor an organization;
Defender of the Faithand the Divine Right of Kings; and
The Monarchist League of Canada Distributes the most recent (2005) official Canadian lithographic portrait of The Queen at no charge but asks for $10 (plus $1 for each additional print up to a maximum of five) to cover mailing and the expense of a packing tube.
Send your cheque to the order of the League at PO Box 1057, Oakville, ON L6J 5E9. If you wish to use your credit card, you may use PayPal, by clicking on the
contribute link on and making a payment in the appropriate amount while advising firstname.lastname@example.org of the purpose of your remittance.
If you are interested in bulk orders for free distribution of The Queen’s picture at fairs, display tables, mall sales and similar events, please write email@example.com to make special arrangements.
The Queen welcomes the frank expressions of Canadians’ concerns. These can be addressed to Her Majesty through her Private Secretary, Rt Hon. Christopher Geidt, and sent to him at Buckingham Palace, London, United Kingdom SW1A 1AA. The correct salutation is
Dear Mr Geidt. Your letter can begin by asking him to share with The Queen or draw to her attention the contents of your communication. Such letters must bear the correct international postage for the size and weight of the letter.
Members of the Royal Family do not send autographs, or autograph pictures or other keepsakes to correspondents. If you are running a recognized charitable event, and would like to obtain such an item for an auction or similar purpose, you may write to the Private Secretary concerned, explaining in detail the nature of the charity and asking for consideration of a specific proposal for the Royal’s assistance. However, such requests are unlikely to be granted unless the Royal Family member concerned is the Patron or otherwise involved in the organization concerned.
Procedures are also in place at Rideau Hall for the delivery of correspondence from Canadians to Buckingham Palace. It is recommended that Canadians first write to Rideau Hall, rather than directly to the Palace, if the question being raised involves the provision of advice or information on the part of Rideau Hall to Palace officials (eg, requests for the use of the title
Royal and Royal patronages, matters relating to official Royal Visits, requests for anniversary or birthday messages, gift offers and similar matters). The address is: Rideau Hall, 1 Sussex Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A1.
Canadians can write directly to other members of the Royal Family at the addresses below. The correct form of salutation for personal mail is
Your Royal Highness and the customary closing is
I remain, Sir (Madam), Yours sincerely, but you are of course free to write in a way that comes naturally to you.
Their addresses are:
|Their Royal Highnesses The Prince of Wales
and The Duchess of Cornwall
United Kingdom SW1A 1BA
|His Royal Highness The Duke of Edinburgh
United Kingdom SW1A 1AA
|His Royal Highness The Duke of York
United Kingdom SW1A 1AA
Their Royal Highnesses The Earl and Countess of Wessex
|Her Royal Highness The Princess Royal
United Kingdom SW1A 1AA
|Their Royal Highnesses The Duke and Duchess of Gloucester
United Kingdom W8 4PU
His Royal Highness The Duke of Kent
|Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Kent
Wren House, Palace Green
United Kingdom W8 4PY
Her Majesty is pleased to send greetings to her subjects celebrating their 60th or greater wedding anniversaries, or their 100th or greater birthdays. These may be arranged through Rideau Hall, but must be requested well in advance of the occasion. For complete information, telephone Rideau Hall at (800) 465-6890, or access the Governor General’s web site at http://www.gg.ca.
Criteria for an organization to receive either of these marks of Royal favour, which are granted rarely, the first of which may only be granted by The Queen, are spelled out on the website of the Department of Canadian Heritage at http://www.pch.gc.ca/pgm/ceem-cced/fr-rf/criter-eng.cfm. An informal inquiry could be made first of The Canadian Secretary to The Queen, Kevin MacLeod, Senate Usher of the Black Rod, The Senate, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A4. Experience shows that any request for the Royal title or The Queen’s patronage may receive more favourable consideration—though there is no guarantee of success—if a current Minister of the Crown assists in promoting it.
If a requestor or organization has an existing relationship with another member of the Royal Family, it is permissible to write directly to the private secretary concerned as to the possibility of patronage.
officialvisit and a
workingvisit? Why does the Monarchist League refer to these visits as
As they are constitutional figures, precedent requires that The Queen—and, almost always, the Prince of Wales—travel to Canada
on advice; that is, on the responsibility of the Government of Canada, with arrangements and engagements cleared through and organized by Ottawa. When planning takes place for these occasions, both The Queen and the Prince of Wales do express preferences and specific interests for their Canadian program; so it is never a waste of time to draw to the attention both of their private secretaries and The Canadian Secretary to The Queen (who almost invariably organizes such
official homecomings) the interest of your organization in hosting a Royal, and the particular significance of what is being proposed.
The vast majority of Royal visits to Canada, however, are
working visits, the impetus for which comes from a province, community, regiment or an organization having Royal Patronage These may receive unofficial federal support such as visa and immigration courtesies, but the responsibility and costs are solely those of the hosts. Appropriate security is always determined by the RCMP, which bears all related expenses.
Onto such visits—and quite frankly, to share the significant costs associated with them—the principal host organization frequently grafts a variety of other engagements for worthy organizations not necessarily previously associated with the Royal Family member concerned. Corresponding well in advance with both the private secretary involved and principal host organizations is the most efficient way of arranging for your own organization’s consideration to form part of the itinerary. Specific requests, a clear timeline and evident experience/ability in executing events are always a plus when plans are considered.
Of the other members of the Royal Family, only the Earl and Countess of Wessex have a Canadian Secretary, Christopher Carnegie, who may be contacted at firstname.lastname@example.org—otherwise it is best to write to the United Kingdom contact, as detailed above.
The Monarchist League refers to all Royal Visits to Canada as
homecomings because Royals return to Canada not as British or Commonwealth figures, but as members of the Canadian Royal Family, equally at home here as they are in Australia, New Zealand, Jamaica, Papua New Guinea, Barbados or any other of the 16 Realms of which The Queen is Sovereign. As The Queen remarked to President Reagan in 1983 as she prepared to leave California for British Columbia:
I am going home to Canada tomorrow. Additionally, when The Queen concluded her 2010 homecoming with a journey to New York City, she pointed out that
I shall be traveling from this Northern Realm as Queen of Canada.
It is indeed true—and you can read a lively account of a young League member’s experiences in London on page 27 of the Autumn-Winter edition of Canadian Monarchist News, accessible in PDF format here. If interested in applying, consult details on the Royal website http://www.royal.gov.uk/TheRoyalHousehold/WorkingfortheRoyalHousehold/SummerJobs/WhatcouldIdo/Wardens.aspx.
It is customary to toast The Queen at public luncheons and dinners as well as at other occasions such as mess dinners and club functions. The Loyal Toast, as it is usually called, is always the first (or only) toast proposed, usually after dessert has been served, although modern custom also permits it to follow the main course.
In a formal setting, the person offering the Toast invites the guests to charge their glasses and be upstanding, and then proposes the Toast in the following terms, in either or both of the Official Languages,
Ladies and Gentleman, The Queen, or
Ladies and Gentleman, The Queen of Canada. Those present raise their glasses and then consume a small portion of their contents—the use of alcohol is optional. Many loyal subjects then choose to utter the loving phrase
God Bless Her before they resume their seats.
It is also perfectly correct to toast The Queen at informal gatherings and family meals, especially on Royal anniversaries and Royal events, and national holidays. At these sorts of occasions, especially when young people or new Canadians are present, it is often customary for the proposer to say a few words about the special nature of the event and why it is appropriate to toast The Queen, and only then ask everyone at the table to stand. Children brought up to be able both to propose and to respond appropriately to such a toast learn not only a good lesson in Canadian civics but also a valuable social skill.
Unfortunately, donations made to the Monarchist League of Canada are not considered tax-deductible by Canada Revenue Agency. As the League does not accept any public subsidies, it relies entirely on the generosity of its members across Canada in order to accomplish its programs.
The League is fortunate to have access to a host of experts on many aspects of the Canadian Crown who are delighted to address interested audiences, often at no cost except for transportation and related expenses, when required. Please direct such requests to the Dominion Office email@example.com, which will put you in touch with the most appropriate potential speaker.
Defender of the Faithin Canada when we don’t have a state religion? Does this have anything to do with the Divine Right of Kings?
The Queen has no religious role in Canada, as we do not have a state religion. The concept of the Divine Right of Kings has not existed for centuries. That view was popular in an age where kings and queens were absolute monarchs, who ruled without any restraint from elected representatives of their people. It held that the monarch derived authority directly from God—and so disobeying the sovereign’s wishes was the same as disobeying God. From its founding in 1867, Canada (in common with other Commonwealth Realms) established a constitutional or limited monarchy. This means that the king or queen reigns, and is the embodiment of the state, but does not rule, which is the duty of the elected government.
When our Queen came to the Throne in 1952, each of her Realms (the countries of which she is Sovereign) adopted its own formula to refer to The Queen in a legal, formal way.
For Canada, this title runs as follows:
Elizabeth II, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom, Canada and her other Realms and Territories, Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith
Moving passage of the Royal Style and Titles Act in Canada’s Parliament on 3rd February 1953, Prime Minister Louis St Laurent explained why the term Defender of the Faith was retained:
In our countries [Canada and the other non-British monarchies of the Commonwealth] there are no established churches, but in our countries there are people who have faith in the direction of human affairs by an all-wise Providence; and we felt that it was a good thing that the civil authorities would proclaim that their organization is such that it is a defence of the continued beliefs in a supreme power that orders the affairs of mere men, and that there could be no reasonable objection from anyone who believed in the Supreme Being in having the sovereign, the head of the civil authority, described as a believer in and a defender of the faith in a supreme ruler.
Contrary to the mistaken view sometimes repeated by the media, The Queen of Canada—who personally is both Anglican (in England) and Presbyterian (in Scotland), two nations having an official state religion—is not in any way an official or representative of the Anglican Church of Canada. It is in fact the Canadian Crown that guarantees all citizens the right to worship God in their own way, or not to do so at all. Canada’s future King, Charles, the Prince of Wales, has mused aloud that as monarch he would like to make the role of the Crown in defending that freedom more explicit, and so be called
Defender of Faith.
The Queen is not
better than anyone else, and no credible authority would endorse such a view. However, constitutional monarchs such as Canada's are born to serve, in a life of service. Unlike many, they have no choice in their destiny. One might think of this as a sacrifice rather than a privilege. Every word uttered, every action taken or not, and, trivially but truly, every nuance of dress or expression will be photographed, circulated around the world and commented upon—often inaccurately and sometimes cruelly—for an entire lifetime. In this sense we might admire rather than deprecate the hereditary tradition of the Crown.
At the same time, accompanying this inevitable destiny is another reality: training from shortly after birth to meet the duties and expectations of the sovereign's role. Many others receive a very general education, then subsequently perhaps choose some specialties to study and yet very often end up following an occupation quite different than anything that had imagined or been trained for. Monarchs have the advantage of long-term preparation to do their best in a demanding task.
It is true that some of our fellow citizens will always resent an hereditary monarch, whether for their inherited privilege or for other reasons—but then, the popularity figures for elected prime ministers and presidents usually run 20 or more points below that of our Queen—not a bad result in a critical, media-driven world. Nobody pretends that the hereditary principle will guarantee great monarchs. However, the Canadian experience in the nearly 150 years since Confederation suggests that it remains the best way we have to ensure impartiality at the apex of today's constitutional arrangements, which Canadians chose to reaffirm in 1982, whereby we permanently lend our power to the sovereign to exercise for on our behalf.
A very compelling summary defence of the hereditary principle has been made by French Canadian historian and educator, Fr Jacques Monet, SJ in his article "The Canadian Monarchy" which was included in The West and the Nation: Essays in Honour of W. L. Morton:
A king is a king, not because he is rich and powerful, not because he is a successful politician, not because he belongs to a particular creed or to a national group. He is King because he is born. And in choosing to leave the selection of their head of state to this most common denominator in the world—the accident of birth—Canadians implicitly proclaim their faith in human equality; their hope for the triumph of nature over political manoeuvre, over social and financial interest; for the victory of the human person.